C-50
VS
Atom x7-Z8750

C-50 vs Atom x7-Z8750

AMD

C-50

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Atom x7-Z8750

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.56 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The C-50 is positioned at rank 777 and the Atom x7-Z8750 is on rank 664, so the Atom x7-Z8750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar C-50

#765
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1144%
#766
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1128%
#767
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1035%
#768
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1030%
#769
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1021%
#771
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
986%
#772
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
945%
#773
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
944%
#774
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
918%
#777
C-50
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7-Z8750

#652
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
907%
#653
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
894%
#654
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
820%
#655
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
817%
#656
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
809%
#658
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
781%
#659
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
749%
#660
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
748%
#661
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
728%
#664
Atom x7-Z8750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
100%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Atom x7-Z8750 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the C-50 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightC-50Atom x7-Z8750
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ontario (2011−2012) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightC-50Atom x7-Z8750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of C-50 and Atom x7-Z8750

AMD

C-50

The C-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,282 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Atom x7-Z8750

The Atom x7-Z8750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,294 points. Launch price was $37.

Processing Power

The C-50 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x7-Z8750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-Z8750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the C-50 versus 2.56 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8750 — a 87.6% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8750. The C-50 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Atom x7-Z8750 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the C-50 scores 1,282 against the Atom x7-Z8750's 1,294 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7-Z8750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureC-50Atom x7-Z8750
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2.56 GHz+156%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
40 nm
14 nm-65%
Architecture
Ontario (2011−2012)
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,282
1,294
🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-50 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x7-Z8750 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Atom x7-Z8750 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-50) vs 2 (Atom x7-Z8750). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-50) vs 2 (Atom x7-Z8750) — the C-50 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-50) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8750).

FeatureC-50Atom x7-Z8750
Socket
FT1
UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4+100%
2
🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6250 (C-50) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x7-Z8750) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

FeatureC-50Atom x7-Z8750
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6250
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)