C-50
VS
Core i3-390M

C-50 vs Core i3-390M

AMD

C-50

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-390M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The C-50 is positioned at rank 777 and the Core i3-390M is on rank 585, so the Core i3-390M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar C-50

#765
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1144%
#766
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1128%
#767
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1035%
#768
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1030%
#769
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1021%
#771
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
986%
#772
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
945%
#773
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
944%
#774
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
918%
#777
C-50
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-390M

#573
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
772%
#574
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
761%
#575
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
698%
#576
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
695%
#577
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
689%
#579
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
665%
#580
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
638%
#581
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
637%
#582
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
620%
#585
Core i3-390M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The C-50 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-390M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightC-50Core i3-390M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ontario (2011−2012) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightC-50Core i3-390M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of C-50 and Core i3-390M

AMD

C-50

The C-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,282 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-390M

The Core i3-390M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,292 points. Launch price was $39.

Processing Power

The C-50 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-390M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the C-50 versus 0.67 GHz on the Core i3-390M — a 39.5% clock advantage for the C-50. The C-50 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core i3-390M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the C-50 scores 1,282 against the Core i3-390M's 1,292 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-390M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-50 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-390M.

FeatureC-50Core i3-390M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1 GHz+49%
0.67 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
40 nm
32 nm-20%
Architecture
Ontario (2011−2012)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,282
1,292
🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-50 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-390M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Core i3-390M supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-50) vs 2 (Core i3-390M). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-50) vs 16 (Core i3-390M) — the Core i3-390M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureC-50Core i3-390M
Socket
FT1
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-50) / VT-x (Core i3-390M). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6250 (C-50) and HD Graphics (Core i3-390M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-390M targets Mobile.

FeatureC-50Core i3-390M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6250
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile