Atom x7-Z8750 vs C-50

Atom x7-Z8750 vs C-50 Performance Spectrum

Atom x7-Z8750

4 / 4

1,294

+0.9%

1,282

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs C-50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs C-50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-Z8750

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 9W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

C-50

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,282 vs 1,294).
❌350% higher power demand at 9W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7-Z8750 better than C-50?

Yes. Atom x7-Z8750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7-Z8750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-Z8750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7-Z8750 still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7-Z8750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-Z8750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs C-50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-Z8750

The Atom x7-Z8750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,294 points. Launch price was $37.

C-50

The C-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,282 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-Z8750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the C-50 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom x7-Z8750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.56 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8750 versus 1 GHz on the C-50 — a 87.6% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8750. The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the C-50 uses Ontario (2011−2012) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8750 scores 1,294 against the C-50's 1,282 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7-Z8750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	C-50
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.56 GHz+156%	1 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-65%	40 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Ontario (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,294	1,282

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the C-50 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x7-Z8750 versus DDR3-1066 on the C-50 — the Atom x7-Z8750 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7-Z8750 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Atom x7-Z8750) vs 1 (C-50). PCIe lanes: 2 (Atom x7-Z8750) vs 4 (C-50) — the C-50 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8750) and AMD BGA413 (C-50).

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	C-50
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	2	4+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x7-Z8750) and Radeon HD 6250 (C-50) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.