Atom x7-Z8750 vs Celeron E3500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Celeron E3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Celeron E3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-Z8750

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Celeron E3500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron E3500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,290 vs 1,294).
❌Launch MSRP is still $62 MSRP, while Atom x7-Z8750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-Z8750 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7-Z8750 better than Celeron E3500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron E3500 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-Z8750 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-Z8750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7-Z8750 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom x7-Z8750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Celeron E3500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-Z8750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Celeron E3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-Z8750

The Atom x7-Z8750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,294 points. Launch price was $37.

Celeron E3500

The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-Z8750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron E3500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom x7-Z8750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.56 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8750 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Celeron E3500 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron E3500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8750 scores 1,294 against the Celeron E3500's 1,290 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom x7-Z8750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Celeron E3500
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.56 GHz	2.7 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,294	1,290
Geekbench 6 Single	—	347
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	624

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E3500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x7-Z8750 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron E3500 — the Atom x7-Z8750 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 2 (Atom x7-Z8750) vs 0 (Celeron E3500) — the Atom x7-Z8750 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8750) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3500).

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Celeron E3500
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	2	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7-Z8750) / VT-x (Celeron E3500). The Atom x7-Z8750 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Celeron E3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.