
Athlon X2 450

Atom x7-Z8750
Athlon X2 450 vs Atom x7-Z8750 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X2 450 vs Atom x7-Z8750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X2 450 vs Atom x7-Z8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X2 450
2014Why buy it
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 2) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Atom x7-Z8750.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Atom x7-Z8750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-Z8750 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Atom x7-Z8750
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Athlon X2 450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,294 vs 1,295).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 450.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X2 450 better than Atom x7-Z8750?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X2 450 vs Atom x7-Z8750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 450
The Athlon X2 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom x7-Z8750
The Atom x7-Z8750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,294 points. Launch price was $37.
Processing Power
The Athlon X2 450 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x7-Z8750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-Z8750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 450 versus 2.56 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8750 — a 41.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 450 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon X2 450 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x7-Z8750 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 450 scores 1,295 against the Atom x7-Z8750's 1,294 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X2 450.
| Feature | Athlon X2 450 | Atom x7-Z8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+52% | 2.56 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+119% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,295 | 1,294 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 450 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7-Z8750 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X2 450 versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x7-Z8750 — the Athlon X2 450 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 450 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X2 450) vs 2 (Atom x7-Z8750) — the Athlon X2 450 offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A88X,A78,A68H (Athlon X2 450) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8750).
| Feature | Athlon X2 450 | Atom x7-Z8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | UTFCBGA1380 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+17% | LPDDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+700% | 2 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X2 450) / not specified (Atom x7-Z8750). The Atom x7-Z8750 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Athlon X2 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X2 450 targets Basic Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon X2 450 rivals Core i3-3220.
| Feature | Athlon X2 450 | Atom x7-Z8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Basic Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















