Athlon X2 450 vs Turion Neo X2 L625

Athlon X2 450 vs Turion Neo X2 L625 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 450

2 / 2

1,295

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion Neo X2 L625

2 / 2

1,313

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 450 vs Turion Neo X2 L625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 450 vs Turion Neo X2 L625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 450

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Turion Neo X2 L625.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,295 vs 1,313).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Turion Neo X2 L625 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Turion Neo X2 L625

2009

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 450.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 450 better than Turion Neo X2 L625?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 450 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion Neo X2 L625 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion Neo X2 L625 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 450 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion Neo X2 L625 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X2 450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X2 450 vs Turion Neo X2 L625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 450

The Athlon X2 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion Neo X2 L625

The Turion Neo X2 L625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,313 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 450 and Turion Neo X2 L625 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 450 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion Neo X2 L625 — a 83.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 450. The Athlon X2 450 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Turion Neo X2 L625 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 450 scores 1,295 against the Turion Neo X2 L625's 1,313 — a 1.4% lead for the Turion Neo X2 L625.

Feature	Athlon X2 450	Turion Neo X2 L625
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+144%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	1 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Congo (2009)
PassMark	1,295	1,313+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 450 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion Neo X2 L625 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon X2 450	Turion Neo X2 L625
Socket	FM2+	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X2 450) / not specified (Turion Neo X2 L625). Primary use case: Athlon X2 450 targets Basic Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon X2 450 rivals Core i3-3220.