Athlon X2 450 vs Core 2 Duo E8500
Athlon X2 450
Core 2 Duo E8500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 450 is positioned at rank 760 and the Core 2 Duo E8500 is on rank 427, so the Core 2 Duo E8500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 450
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X2 450 | Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($26) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X2 450 | Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+73%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($26) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 450 and Core 2 Duo E8500
Athlon X2 450
The Athlon X2 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo E8500
The Core 2 Duo E8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.16 GHz, with boost up to 3.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,297 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X2 450 and Core 2 Duo E8500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 450 versus 3.17 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8500 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 450 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.16 GHz). The Athlon X2 450 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 450 scores 1,295 against the Core 2 Duo E8500's 1,297 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8500.
| Feature | Athlon X2 450 | Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+23% | 3.17 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+11% | 3.16 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,295 | 1,297 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 450 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X2 450 versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8500 — the Core 2 Duo E8500 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A88X,A78,A68H (Athlon X2 450) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E8500).
| Feature | Athlon X2 450 | Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | 1333+44333% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+104857500% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X2 450) vs true (Core 2 Duo E8500). Primary use case: Athlon X2 450 targets Basic Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon X2 450 rivals Core i3-3220; Core 2 Duo E8500 rivals Phenom II X2 550.
| Feature | Athlon X2 450 | Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Basic Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X2 450 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8500 debuted at $26. At current prices ($15 vs $26), the Athlon X2 450 is $11 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 450 delivers 86.3 pts/$ vs 49.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8500 — making the Athlon X2 450 the 53.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X2 450 | Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $26-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-42% | $26 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.3+73% | 49.9 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X2 450 and Core 2 Duo E8500
