Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-3227U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-3227U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-3227U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-Z8750

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,294 vs 1,299).

Core i3-3227U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 2) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7-Z8750 better than Core i3-3227U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x7-Z8750 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3227U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3227U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7-Z8750 still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7-Z8750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-Z8750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-3227U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-Z8750

The Atom x7-Z8750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,294 points. Launch price was $37.

Core i3-3227U

The Core i3-3227U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,299 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-Z8750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3227U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-Z8750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.56 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8750 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-3227U — a 29.6% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8750 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3227U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8750 scores 1,294 against the Core i3-3227U's 1,299 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-3227U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x7-Z8750 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3227U.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Core i3-3227U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.56 GHz+35%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,294	1,299
Geekbench 6 Single	—	400
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	900

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3227U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3227U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 2 (Atom x7-Z8750) vs 16 (Core i3-3227U) — the Core i3-3227U offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8750) and HM77,HM76 (Core i3-3227U).

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Core i3-3227U
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1600	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	2	16+700%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7-Z8750) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-3227U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x7-Z8750) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3227U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3227U targets Legacy Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i3-3227U rivals AMD A6-4455M.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Core i3-3227U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Legacy Ultrabook