C-50 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

CPU

GPU

C-50

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

C-50 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Performance Spectrum

C-50

2 / 2

1,282

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2 / 2

1,275

0.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-50 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-50 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-50

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌800% higher power demand at 9W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 9W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,275 vs 1,282).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while C-50 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while C-50 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T3500 better than C-50?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, C-50 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, C-50 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core T3500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that C-50 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-50 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-50 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-50

The C-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,282 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the C-50 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the C-50 versus 2.1 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 — a 71% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500. The C-50 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the C-50 scores 1,282 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3500's 1,275 — a 0.5% lead for the C-50.

Feature	C-50	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	2.1 GHz+110%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	40 nm-11%	45 nm
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,282	1,275

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-50 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-50 versus 800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 — the C-50 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-50) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-50) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) — the C-50 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-50) and GL40,GM45,GM47 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500).

Feature	C-50	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Socket	FT1	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-50) / false (Celeron Dual-Core T3500). The C-50 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 rivals Pentium T4400.