Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T

Intel

Celeron 1000M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron G550T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1000M

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,070 vs 1,074).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
    • 1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

    Celeron G550T

    2011

    Why buy it

    • Costs $44 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
    • Delivers 105.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
    • Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron G550T better than Celeron 1000M?
    Yes. Celeron G550T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron G550T has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 22.2% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G550T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron G550T is the better buy right now. Celeron G550T comes in $44 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% higher PassMark. It is also 105.5% better value on MSRP (25.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron 1000M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 1000M

    The Celeron 1000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,070 points. Launch price was $86.

    Intel

    Celeron G550T

    The Celeron G550T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,074 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Celeron 1000M and Celeron G550T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1000M versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G550T — a 20% clock advantage for the Celeron G550T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron 1000M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G550T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1000M scores 1,070 against the Celeron G550T's 1,074 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G550T. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCeleron 1000MCeleron G550T
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz
    2.2 GHz+22%
    Base Clock
    1.8 GHz
    2.2 GHz+22%
    L3 Cache
    2 MB (total)
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    22 nm-31%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    PassMark
    1,070
    1,074
    Geekbench 6 Single
    366
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    656
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron 1000M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G550T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1000M versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G550T — the Celeron 1000M supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCPGA988 (Celeron 1000M) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G550T).

    FeatureCeleron 1000MCeleron G550T
    Socket
    PGA988
    LGA1155
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600+50%
    DDR3-1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1000M) / VT-x (Celeron G550T). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1000M) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G550T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G550T rivals Pentium G630T.

    FeatureCeleron 1000MCeleron G550T
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
    HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron 1000M was priced at $86, while the Celeron G550T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($86 vs $42), Celeron G550T was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1000M delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 25.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G550T — making the Celeron G550T the 69.1% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron 1000MCeleron G550T
    MSRP
    $86
    $42-51%
    Performance per Dollar
    12.4
    25.6+106%
    Release Date
    2013
    2011

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.