
Celeron 1000M

Celeron G550T
Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1000M
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,070 vs 1,074).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
Celeron G550T
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G550T better than Celeron 1000M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1000M vs Celeron G550T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1000M
The Celeron 1000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,070 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron G550T
The Celeron G550T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,074 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 1000M and Celeron G550T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1000M versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G550T — a 20% clock advantage for the Celeron G550T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron 1000M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G550T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1000M scores 1,070 against the Celeron G550T's 1,074 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G550T. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 1000M | Celeron G550T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,070 | 1,074 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 366 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 656 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1000M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G550T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1000M versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G550T — the Celeron 1000M supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCPGA988 (Celeron 1000M) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G550T).
| Feature | Celeron 1000M | Celeron G550T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1000M) / VT-x (Celeron G550T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1000M) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G550T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G550T rivals Pentium G630T.
| Feature | Celeron 1000M | Celeron G550T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 1000M was priced at $86, while the Celeron G550T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($86 vs $42), Celeron G550T was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1000M delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 25.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G550T — making the Celeron G550T the 69.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1000M | Celeron G550T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $42-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 25.6+106% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














