Celeron 1000M
VS
Pentium E5500

Celeron 1000M vs Pentium E5500

Intel

Celeron 1000M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium E5500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1000M is positioned at rank 1026 and the Pentium E5500 is on rank 913, so the Pentium E5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1000M

#1014
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2359%
#1015
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2324%
#1016
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2133%
#1017
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2124%
#1018
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2104%
#1020
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2032%
#1021
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1949%
#1022
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1945%
#1023
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1893%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
95%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21967%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20757%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15071%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4540%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3596%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3146%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1802%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1778%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1619%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1619%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1601%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1558%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1536%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1530%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1516%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#912
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
100%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
100%
#914
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#915
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#916
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
99%
#918
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
99%
#919
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#920
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
99%
#921
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
#922
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
97%
#924
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
97%
#925
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
96%
#926
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
96%
#927
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium E5500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1000M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1000MPentium E5500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium E5500 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 71% cheaper ($25 vs $86) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron 1000MPentium E5500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+242%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5500

Intel

Celeron 1000M

The Celeron 1000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,070 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Pentium E5500

The Pentium E5500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,064 points. Launch price was $109.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1000M versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E5500 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E5500 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 1000M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E5500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1000M scores 1,070 against the Pentium E5500's 1,064 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 1000M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1000M vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5500.

FeatureCeleron 1000MPentium E5500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,070
1,064
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1000M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1000MPentium E5500
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

The Celeron 1000M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium E5500 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1000MPentium E5500
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1000M launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium E5500 debuted at $75.

FeatureCeleron 1000MPentium E5500
MSRP
$86
$75-13%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Release Date
2013
2010