Celeron 1000M vs Pentium E5500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1000M vs Pentium E5500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1000M vs Pentium E5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1000M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium E5500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium E5500

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.2 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,064 vs 1,070).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1000M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5500 better than Celeron 1000M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E5500 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1000M pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1000M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5500 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5500 comes in $11 cheaper on MSRP at $75 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 1000M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 14.0% better value on MSRP (14.2 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1000M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1000M vs Pentium E5500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1000M

The Celeron 1000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,070 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium E5500

The Pentium E5500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,064 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1000M versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E5500 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E5500 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 1000M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E5500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1000M scores 1,070 against the Pentium E5500's 1,064 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 1000M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1000M vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5500.

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Pentium E5500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,070	1,064

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1000M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Pentium E5500
Socket	PGA988	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

The Celeron 1000M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium E5500 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Pentium E5500
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1000M was priced at $86, while the Pentium E5500 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($86 vs $75), Pentium E5500 was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1000M delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium E5500 — making the Pentium E5500 the 13.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Pentium E5500
MSRP	$86	$75-13%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	14.2+15%
Release Date	2013	2010

Search Celeron 1000M on Amazon

Search Pentium E5500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.