PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1000M

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,070 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +687.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 926.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA988 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌
127.9% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$86 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1000M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron 1000M?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 687.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2239.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 687.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2239.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 127.9% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 687.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 926.4% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of PGA988, 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1000M

The Celeron 1000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,070 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1000M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1000M versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 87.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 1000M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1000M scores 1,070 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 183.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1000M vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	4.6 GHz+156%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.5 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+900%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	1,070	25,029+2239%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1000M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1000M versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1000M) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCPGA988 (Celeron 1000M) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Core i5-13400F
Socket	PGA988	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	192 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1000M) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron 1000M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1000M was priced at $86, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($86 vs $196), Celeron 1000M was $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1000M delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 164.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1000M	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$86-56%	$196
Performance per Dollar	12.4	127.7+930%
Release Date	2013	2023

Search Celeron 1000M on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.