Celeron 1020M
VS
A4-4020

Celeron 1020M vs A4-4020

Intel

Celeron 1020M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A4-4020

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1020M is positioned at rank 170 and the A4-4020 is on rank 768, so the Celeron 1020M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1020M

#158
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
345%
#159
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
340%
#160
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
312%
#161
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
311%
#162
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
308%
#164
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
297%
#165
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
285%
#166
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
285%
#167
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
277%
#170
Celeron 1020M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
99%
#176
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-4020

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14738%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13926%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10112%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3046%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2413%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2111%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1209%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1193%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1086%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1086%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1074%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1045%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1031%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1026%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1017%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
99%
#768
A4-4020
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
100%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
100%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
99%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
99%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
99%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
98%
#779
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
98%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
98%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-4020 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1020M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1020MA4-4020
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1020MA4-4020
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1020M and A4-4020

Intel

Celeron 1020M

The Celeron 1020M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

A4-4020

The A4-4020 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,269 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1020M and A4-4020 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron 1020M versus 3.4 GHz on the A4-4020 — a 47.3% clock advantage for the A4-4020 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron 1020M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the A4-4020 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020M scores 1,275 against the A4-4020's 1,269 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 1020M.

FeatureCeleron 1020MA4-4020
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+62%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (total)+300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,275
1,269
Geekbench 6 Single
341
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1020M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A4-4020 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 1020M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1020M) and A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-4020).

FeatureCeleron 1020MA4-4020
Socket
PGA988
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1020M) vs AMD-V (A4-4020). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1020M) and Radeon HD 7480D (A4-4020) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020M targets Budget, A4-4020 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020M rivals Pentium 2020M; A4-4020 rivals Pentium G3220.

FeatureCeleron 1020MA4-4020
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Radeon HD 7480D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Budget Desktop