Celeron 2.10 vs Sempron 2500+
Celeron 2.10
Sempron 2500+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.10 is positioned at rank 1066 and the Sempron 2500+ is on rank 1007, so the Sempron 2500+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.10
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 2500+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.10 | Sempron 2500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.10 | Sempron 2500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.10 and Sempron 2500+
Celeron 2.10
The Celeron 2.10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 2500+
The Sempron 2500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.10 and Sempron 2500+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron 2.10 versus 1.75 GHz on the Sempron 2500+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.10. The Celeron 2.10 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 2500+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.10 scores 285 against the Sempron 2500+'s 277 — a 2.8% lead for the Celeron 2.10. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.10 | Sempron 2500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz+20% | 1.75 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 256 kB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Northwood (2002−2004) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 285+3% | 277 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2.10 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 2500+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 2.10 | Sempron 2500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.10) / not specified (Sempron 2500+). Primary use case: Celeron 2.10 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.10 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Celeron 2.10 | Sempron 2500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.10 and Sempron 2500+
