Athlon XP 2400+ vs Celeron 2.10

Athlon XP 2400+ vs Celeron 2.10 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 2400+

1 / 1

305

+7.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Celeron 2.10

1 / 1

285

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2400+ vs Celeron 2.10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 2400+ vs Celeron 2.10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2400+

2002

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 68W instead of 73W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 5.8 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Celeron 2.10

2002

Why buy it

✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅Delivers 268.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 1.6 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 2400+ across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (285 vs 305).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon XP 2400+ better than Celeron 2.10?

Yes. Athlon XP 2400+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon XP 2400+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 15 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon XP 2400+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon XP 2400+ comes in 293.9% more expensive on MSRP at $193 MSRP versus $49 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 2.10 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2002 platform. Even with 268.0% better value on paper (5.8 vs 1.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon XP 2400+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 2400+ vs Celeron 2.10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 2400+

The Athlon XP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron 2.10

The Celeron 2.10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 2400+ and Celeron 2.10 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon XP 2400+ versus 2.1 GHz on the Celeron 2.10 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.10. The Athlon XP 2400+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.10 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2400+ scores 305 against the Celeron 2.10's 285 — a 6.8% lead for the Athlon XP 2400+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 2400+	Celeron 2.10
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB+100%	128 kB
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Thorton (2001−2003)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	305+7%	285

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2400+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 2.10 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2400+ versus DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.10 — the Celeron 2.10 supports -250.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2400+) and 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.10).

Feature	Athlon XP 2400+	Celeron 2.10
Socket	A	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-266	DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 2400+) / No (Celeron 2.10). Primary use case: Celeron 2.10 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.10 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

Feature	Athlon XP 2400+	Celeron 2.10
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	No
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 2400+ was priced at $193, while the Celeron 2.10 came in at $49. On launch pricing ($193 vs $49), Celeron 2.10 was $144 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2400+ delivers 1.6 pts/$ vs 5.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 2.10 — making the Celeron 2.10 the 114.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon XP 2400+	Celeron 2.10
MSRP	$193	$49-75%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	5.8+262%
Release Date	2002	2002

Search Athlon XP 2400+ on Amazon

Search Celeron 2.10 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.