CPU
GPU
Athlon XP 2400+
Celeron 220
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 2400+ is positioned at rank 1109 and the Celeron 220 is on rank 1143, so the Athlon XP 2400+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2400+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 220
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon XP 2400+ | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Thorton (2001−2003) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon XP 2400+ | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+300%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 2400+ and Celeron 220
Athlon XP 2400+
The Athlon XP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $90.
Celeron 220
The Celeron 220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 2400+ and Celeron 220 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon XP 2400+ versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron 220 — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2400+. The Athlon XP 2400+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 220 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2400+ scores 305 against the Celeron 220's 320 — a 4.8% lead for the Celeron 220. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2400+ | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+67% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Thorton (2001−2003) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 305 | 320+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 2400+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 220 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2400+ versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 220 — the Celeron 220 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2400+) and 945G,G31,G41 (Celeron 220).
| Feature | Athlon XP 2400+ | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-266 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 2400+) / No (Celeron 220). Primary use case: Celeron 220 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 220 rivals Athlon 64 3100+.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2400+ | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon XP 2400+ launched at $193 MSRP, while the Celeron 220 debuted at $42. At current prices ($10 vs $42), the Athlon XP 2400+ is $32 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2400+ delivers 30.5 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Celeron 220 — making the Athlon XP 2400+ the 120% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2400+ | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $42-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-76% | $42 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.5+301% | 7.6 |
| Release Date | 2002 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 2400+ and Celeron 220
