Celeron 2.20 vs Sempron 2800+

Celeron 2.20 vs Sempron 2800+ Performance Spectrum

Celeron 2.20

1 / 1

305

0.0%

320

+4.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.20 vs Sempron 2800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.20 vs Sempron 2800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.20

2002

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (305 vs 320).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($79 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
❌17.7% higher power demand at 73W vs 62W.

Sempron 2800+

2001

Why buy it

✅+4.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($65 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($65 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 73W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 2800+ better than Celeron 2.20?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 2.20 is ahead with 10% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 2800+ pulls ahead with 4.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 2800+ is the better buy right now. Sempron 2800+ comes in $14 cheaper on MSRP at $65 MSRP versus $79 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron 2.20 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 10% higher max boost clock. It is also 27.5% better value on MSRP (4.9 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2.20 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2002 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2.20 vs Sempron 2800+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.20

The Celeron 2.20 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 2800+

The Sempron 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $104.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.20 and Sempron 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 2.20 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 2800+ — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.20. The Celeron 2.20 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 2800+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.20 scores 305 against the Sempron 2800+'s 320 — a 4.8% lead for the Sempron 2800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 2.20	Sempron 2800+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	128 kB	256K+100%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Manila (2001−2006)
PassMark	305	320+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.20 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 2800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.20 versus DDR-333 on the Sempron 2800+ — the Celeron 2.20 supports -220.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2.20 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron 2.20	Sempron 2800+
Socket	PGA478	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 2.20) vs None (Sempron 2800+). Primary use case: Celeron 2.20 targets Budget, Sempron 2800+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.20 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

Feature	Celeron 2.20	Sempron 2800+
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	None
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 2.20 was priced at $79, while the Sempron 2800+ came in at $65. On launch pricing ($79 vs $65), Sempron 2800+ was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.20 delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Sempron 2800+ — making the Sempron 2800+ the 24.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 2.20	Sempron 2800+
MSRP	$79	$65-18%
Performance per Dollar	3.9	4.9+26%
Release Date	2002	2001

Search Celeron 2.20 on Amazon

Search Sempron 2800+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.