Celeron 2.20
VS
Mobile Sempron SI-40

Celeron 2.20 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

Intel

Celeron 2.20

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2002
VS
AMD

Mobile Sempron SI-40

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.20 is positioned at rank 1081 and the Mobile Sempron SI-40 is on rank 1182, so the Celeron 2.20 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.20

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
80755%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
76306%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
55404%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
16691%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
13221%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
11566%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6624%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6538%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5953%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5952%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5886%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5727%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5647%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5624%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5573%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
93%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
93%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
91%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
90%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
89%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
86%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
85%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
85%
#1090
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
85%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
85%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
84%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
84%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
80%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
78%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Sempron SI-40

#1170
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4556%
#1171
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4489%
#1172
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4121%
#1173
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4102%
#1174
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4065%
#1176
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3925%
#1177
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3764%
#1178
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3758%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3657%
#1182
Mobile Sempron SI-40
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
97%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
95%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
94%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
94%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
93%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
91%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
88%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
87%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
87%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Mobile Sempron SI-40 (2008) utilizes 65 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 2.20Mobile Sempron SI-40
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sable (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 2.20 (2002) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 2.20Mobile Sempron SI-40
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.20 and Mobile Sempron SI-40

Intel

Celeron 2.20

The Celeron 2.20 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Mobile Sempron SI-40

The Mobile Sempron SI-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Sable (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 322 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.20 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 2.20 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron SI-40 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.20. The Celeron 2.20 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses Sable (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.20 scores 305 against the Mobile Sempron SI-40's 322 — a 5.4% lead for the Mobile Sempron SI-40.

FeatureCeleron 2.20Mobile Sempron SI-40
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
128 kB
512 kB+300%
Process
130 nm
65 nm-50%
Architecture
Northwood (2002−2004)
Sable (2008−2009)
PassMark
305
322+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.20 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 2.20Mobile Sempron SI-40
Socket
PGA478
S1g2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.20) / not specified (Mobile Sempron SI-40). Primary use case: Celeron 2.20 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.20 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

FeatureCeleron 2.20Mobile Sempron SI-40
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget