Celeron 2.80
VS
Sempron LE-1300

Celeron 2.80 vs Sempron LE-1300

Intel

Celeron 2.80

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Sempron LE-1300

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.80 is positioned at rank 1076 and the Sempron LE-1300 is on rank 905, so the Sempron LE-1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.80

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
72831%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
68818%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
49967%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
15053%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
11924%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
10431%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
5974%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
5896%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5369%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5368%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5308%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5165%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5093%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5072%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5026%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
95%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
93%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
92%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
92%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
90%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
84%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
84%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
82%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
81%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
80%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
78%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
77%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
77%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
77%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron LE-1300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20174%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14648%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4413%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3495%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3058%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1751%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1728%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1574%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1574%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1556%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1514%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1493%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1487%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1473%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
96%
#905
Sempron LE-1300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#907
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
99%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
99%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
98%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
97%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
97%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
97%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
96%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
96%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 2.80 leads in gaming performance. However, the Sempron LE-1300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 2.80Sempron LE-1300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sparta (2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2.80Sempron LE-1300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.80 and Sempron LE-1300

Intel

Celeron 2.80

The Celeron 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Sempron LE-1300

The Sempron LE-1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 438 points. Launch price was $12.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.80 and Sempron LE-1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron 2.80 versus 2.3 GHz on the Sempron LE-1300 — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.80. The Celeron 2.80 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.80 scores 428 against the Sempron LE-1300's 438 — a 2.3% lead for the Sempron LE-1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron 2.80Sempron LE-1300
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+22%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
128 kB
512 kB+300%
Process
130 nm
65 nm-50%
Architecture
Northwood (2002−2004)
Sparta (2007)
PassMark
428
438+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.80 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 2.80Sempron LE-1300
Socket
PGA478
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.80) / not specified (Sempron LE-1300). Primary use case: Celeron 2.80 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.80 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureCeleron 2.80Sempron LE-1300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget