Celeron 2961Y vs Celeron E3200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2961Y vs Celeron E3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2961Y vs Celeron E3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2961Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Celeron E3200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,085 vs 1,090).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Celeron E3200

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $43 MSRP, while Celeron 2961Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2961Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3200 better than Celeron 2961Y?

Yes. Celeron E3200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E3200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E3200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3200 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $43 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2961Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2961Y vs Celeron E3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2961Y

The Celeron 2961Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron E3200

The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2961Y and Celeron E3200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 2961Y versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 — a 74.3% clock advantage for the Celeron E3200 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 2961Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron E3200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2961Y scores 1,085 against the Celeron E3200's 1,090 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron E3200. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2961Y vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3200.

Feature	Celeron 2961Y	Celeron E3200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+118%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+118%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,085	1,090
Geekbench 6 Single	—	340
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	610

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2961Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E3200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2961Y versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E3200 — the Celeron 2961Y supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 2961Y) vs 0 (Celeron E3200) — the Celeron 2961Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2961Y) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3200).

Feature	Celeron 2961Y	Celeron E3200
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron 2961Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Celeron E3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2961Y targets Budget, Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2961Y rivals Pentium 2117U; Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.