Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron 2961Y

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron 2961Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 235e

2 / 2

1,079

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 2961Y

2 / 2

1,085

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron 2961Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron 2961Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 235e

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron 2961Y.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,079 vs 1,085).
❌Launch MSRP is still $69 MSRP, while Celeron 2961Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2961Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron 2961Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Athlon II X2 235e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 235e.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 235e better than Celeron 2961Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 235e is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2961Y pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2961Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 235e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 235e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $69 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 2961Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2961Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron 2961Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 235e

The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.

Celeron 2961Y

The Celeron 2961Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 235e and Celeron 2961Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 2961Y — a 84.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Athlon II X2 235e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 2961Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 235e scores 1,079 against the Celeron 2961Y's 1,085 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 2961Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 235e vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2961Y.

Feature	Athlon II X2 235e	Celeron 2961Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+145%	1.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+145%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,079	1,085
Geekbench 6 Single	240	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 235e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2961Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 235e versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2961Y — the Celeron 2961Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 235e) vs 12 (Celeron 2961Y) — the Celeron 2961Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 235e) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2961Y).

Feature	Athlon II X2 235e	Celeron 2961Y
Socket	AM3	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	0	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 235e) vs VT-x (Celeron 2961Y). The Celeron 2961Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon II X2 235e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop, Celeron 2961Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300; Celeron 2961Y rivals Pentium 2117U.