Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon II X2 210e vs Athlon II X2 235e

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon II X2 210e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2010
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 235e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009
Buy on Amazon

Athlon II X2 210e vs Athlon II X2 235e Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 210e
2 / 2
1,089
+0.9%
brand logoAthlon 64 3600+
brand logoAthlon 64 FX-57
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 TK-42
brand logoAthlon II X2 250u
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 5650G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Athlon II X2 235e
2 / 2
1,079
0.0%
brand logoAthlon 64 3600+
brand logoAthlon 64 FX-57
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 TK-42
brand logoAthlon II X2 250u
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 5650G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 210e vs Athlon II X2 235e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Athlon II X2 210e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
1080P
Athlon II X2 235e
low27 FPS
medium27 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra27 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Athlon II X2 210e vs Athlon II X2 235e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 210e

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
  • ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 16.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon II X2 235e

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,079 vs 1,089).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon II X2 210e better than Athlon II X2 235e?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 235e is ahead with 3.8% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 210e pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 210e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon II X2 210e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 210e comes in $9 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon II X2 235e is still the better pure gaming CPU with 3.8% higher max boost clock. It is also 16.1% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 15.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon II X2 210e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon II X2 210e vs Athlon II X2 235e Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon II X2 210e

    The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Athlon II X2 235e

    The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon II X2 210e and Athlon II X2 235e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 210e scores 1,089 against the Athlon II X2 235e's 1,079 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X2 210e. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon II X2 210eAthlon II X2 235e
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.6 GHz
    2.7 GHz+4%
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz
    2.7 GHz+4%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    1 MB+100%
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Regor (2009−2013)
    Regor (2009−2013)
    PassMark
    1,089
    1,079
    Geekbench 6 Single
    —
    240
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    —
    450
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 210e) and 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 235e).

    FeatureAthlon II X2 210eAthlon II X2 235e
    Socket
    AM3
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    1333
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 210e) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X2 235e). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300; Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300.

    FeatureAthlon II X2 210eAthlon II X2 235e
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    true
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    —
    Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon II X2 210e was priced at $60, while the Athlon II X2 235e came in at $69. On launch pricing ($60 vs $69), Athlon II X2 210e was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 210e delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 235e — making the Athlon II X2 210e the 14.9% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon II X2 210eAthlon II X2 235e
    MSRP
    $60-13%
    $69
    Performance per Dollar
    18.1+16%
    15.6
    Release Date
    2010
    2009
    Search Athlon II X2 210e on AmazonSearch Athlon II X2 235e on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.