
Athlon II X2 210e vs Core i7-620UM

Athlon II X2 210e

Core i7-620UM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 210e is positioned at rank 837 and the Core i7-620UM is on rank 1228, so the Athlon II X2 210e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 210e
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620UM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 210e | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($28) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($278) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 210e | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+891%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($28) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($278) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 210e and Core i7-620UM

Athlon II X2 210e
The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-620UM
The Core i7-620UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $278.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 210e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-620UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e versus 2.13 GHz on the Core i7-620UM — a 19.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 210e (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.06 GHz). The Athlon II X2 210e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-620UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 210e scores 1,089 against the Core i7-620UM's 1,091 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-620UM. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 210e vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620UM.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+22% | 2.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+145% | 1.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,089 | 1,091 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 350 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 700 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 210e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-620UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 210e versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-620UM — the Athlon II X2 210e supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 210e supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 210e) vs 16 (Core i7-620UM) — the Core i7-620UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 210e) and HM55,QM57 (Core i7-620UM).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 8 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 210e) vs VT-x (Core i7-620UM). The Core i7-620UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II X2 210e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620UM targets Ultra-Portable Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300; Core i7-620UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Ultra-Portable Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 210e launched at $60 MSRP, while the Core i7-620UM debuted at $278.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-78% | $278 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $28 | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















