Athlon II X2 210e
Core 2 Duo E8335
Athlon II X2 210e vs Core 2 Duo E8335 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 210e vs Core 2 Duo E8335 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 210e vs Core 2 Duo E8335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 210e
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 231.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 5.5 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Duo E8335.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,089 vs 1,094).
Core 2 Duo E8335
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 44W instead of 45W, a 1W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 210e.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 210e better than Core 2 Duo E8335?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 210e vs Core 2 Duo E8335 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X2 210e
The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo E8335
The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 210e and Core 2 Duo E8335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e versus 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 — a 94.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 210e (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.933 GHz). The Athlon II X2 210e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 210e scores 1,089 against the Core 2 Duo E8335's 1,094 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8335.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+180% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.933 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,089 | 1,094 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 210e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 210e) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 210e was priced at $60, while the Core 2 Duo E8335 came in at $200. On launch pricing ($60 vs $200), Athlon II X2 210e was $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 210e delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 5.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8335 — making the Athlon II X2 210e the 107.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-70% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.1+229% | 5.5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 210e and Core 2 Duo E8335
