
Athlon II X2 210e vs Core 2 Duo E8335

Athlon II X2 210e

Core 2 Duo E8335
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 210e is positioned at rank 837 and the Core 2 Duo E8335 is on rank 1196, so the Athlon II X2 210e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 210e
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8335
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($28) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+78%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($28) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 210e and Core 2 Duo E8335

Athlon II X2 210e
The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo E8335
The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 210e and Core 2 Duo E8335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e versus 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 — a 94.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 210e (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.933 GHz). The Athlon II X2 210e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 210e scores 1,089 against the Core 2 Duo E8335's 1,094 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8335.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+180% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.933 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,089 | 1,094 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 210e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 210e) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 210e launched at $60 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8335 debuted at $200. At current prices ($28 vs $50), the Athlon II X2 210e is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 210e delivers 38.9 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8335 — making the Athlon II X2 210e the 56% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 210e | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-70% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $28-44% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.9+78% | 21.9 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















