Athlon II X2 210e
VS
Core 2 Duo T9600

Athlon II X2 210e vs Core 2 Duo T9600

AMD

Athlon II X2 210e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9600

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 210e is positioned at rank 837 and the Core 2 Duo T9600 is on rank 841, so the Athlon II X2 210e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 210e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17174%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16228%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11783%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3550%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2812%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2460%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1409%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1390%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1266%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1266%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1252%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1218%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1201%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1196%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1185%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
100%
#839
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
99%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
99%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
99%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
99%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
98%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
98%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9600

#829
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1350%
#830
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1330%
#831
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1221%
#832
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1215%
#833
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1204%
#835
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1163%
#836
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1115%
#837
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1113%
#838
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1083%
#841
Core 2 Duo T9600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo T9600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon II X2 210e is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II X2 210eCore 2 Duo T9600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($28)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II X2 210eCore 2 Duo T9600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($28)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 210e and Core 2 Duo T9600

AMD

Athlon II X2 210e

The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9600

The Core 2 Duo T9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,087 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 210e and Core 2 Duo T9600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9600 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9600 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon II X2 210e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 210e scores 1,089 against the Core 2 Duo T9600's 1,087 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 210e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 210e vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9600.

FeatureAthlon II X2 210eCore 2 Duo T9600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB
6 MB+1100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,089
1,087
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 210e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II X2 210eCore 2 Duo T9600
Socket
AM3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 210e) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T9600). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300.

FeatureAthlon II X2 210eCore 2 Duo T9600
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true