Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron G1101

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron G1101 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 235e

2 / 2

1,079

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1101

2 / 2

1,086

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron G1101 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron G1101: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 235e

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 73W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (240 vs 250).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1101 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G1101

2010

Why buy it

✅+4.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Athlon II X2 235e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌62.2% higher power demand at 73W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1101 better than Athlon II X2 235e?

Yes. Celeron G1101 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1101 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

There is no clear productivity winner in the data we have.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1101 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1101 comes in $19 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.9% better value on MSRP (21.7 vs 15.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1101 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Celeron G1101 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 235e

The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 235e and Celeron G1101 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e versus 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 — a 163.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Athlon II X2 235e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G1101 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 235e scores 1,079 against the Celeron G1101's 1,086 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G1101. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 240 vs 250, a 4.1% lead for the Celeron G1101 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 450 (0% advantage for the Celeron G1101). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 235e vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1101.

Feature	Athlon II X2 235e	Celeron G1101
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+900%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+19%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,079	1,086
Geekbench 6 Single	240	250+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 235e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1101 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 235e versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G1101 — the Athlon II X2 235e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1101 supports up to 16.38 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 2.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 235e) vs 16 (Celeron G1101) — the Celeron G1101 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 235e) and H55,3420 (Celeron G1101).

Feature	Athlon II X2 235e	Celeron G1101
Socket	AM3	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16.38 GB+2%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 235e) vs VT-x (Celeron G1101). The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Athlon II X2 235e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop, Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300; Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.

Feature	Athlon II X2 235e	Celeron G1101
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 235e was priced at $69, while the Celeron G1101 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($69 vs $50), Celeron G1101 was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 235e delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Celeron G1101 — making the Celeron G1101 the 32.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 235e	Celeron G1101
MSRP	$69	$50-28%
Performance per Dollar	15.6	21.7+39%
Release Date	2009	2010

Search Athlon II X2 235e on Amazon

Search Celeron G1101 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.