Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M

AMD

Athlon II X2 235e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-350M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 235e

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $61 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • Delivers 86.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i3-350M.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (240 vs 280).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (450 vs 650).
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-350M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-350M

2010

Why buy it

  • +16.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Athlon II X2 235e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 235e.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-350M better than Athlon II X2 235e?
Yes. Core i3-350M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 44.4% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-350M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-350M is the stronger fit. You are getting 44.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-350M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-350M comes in 88.4% more expensive on MSRP at $130 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X2 235e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 86.8% better value on paper (15.6 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-350M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X2 235e

The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.

Intel

Core i3-350M

The Core i3-350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,088 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 235e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-350M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e versus 0.27 GHz on the Core i3-350M — a 163.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Athlon II X2 235e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-350M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 235e scores 1,079 against the Core i3-350M's 1,088 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-350M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 240 vs 280, a 15.4% lead for the Core i3-350M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 650 (36.4% advantage for the Core i3-350M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 235e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-350M.

FeatureAthlon II X2 235eCore i3-350M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+900%
0.27 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+19%
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB
256K (per core)+25500%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,079
1,088
Geekbench 6 Single
240
280+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
650+44%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 235e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-350M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 235e versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-350M — the Athlon II X2 235e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 235e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 235e) vs 16 (Core i3-350M) — the Core i3-350M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 235e) and HM55,HM57 (Core i3-350M).

FeatureAthlon II X2 235eCore i3-350M
Socket
AM3
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+25%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 235e) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-350M). The Core i3-350M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon II X2 235e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop, Core i3-350M targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300; Core i3-350M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.

FeatureAthlon II X2 235eCore i3-350M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop
Entry Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 235e was priced at $69, while the Core i3-350M came in at $130. On launch pricing ($69 vs $130), Athlon II X2 235e was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 235e delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-350M — making the Athlon II X2 235e the 60.6% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X2 235eCore i3-350M
MSRP
$69-47%
$130
Performance per Dollar
15.6+86%
8.4
Release Date
2009
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.