
Athlon II X2 235e

Core i3-350M
Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 235e
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 86.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i3-350M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (240 vs 280).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (450 vs 650).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-350M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-350M
2010Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Athlon II X2 235e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 235e.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-350M better than Athlon II X2 235e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 235e vs Core i3-350M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 235e
The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.

Core i3-350M
The Core i3-350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,088 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 235e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-350M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e versus 0.27 GHz on the Core i3-350M — a 163.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Athlon II X2 235e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-350M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 235e scores 1,079 against the Core i3-350M's 1,088 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-350M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 240 vs 280, a 15.4% lead for the Core i3-350M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 650 (36.4% advantage for the Core i3-350M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 235e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-350M.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 235e | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+900% | 0.27 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+19% | 2.26 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,079 | 1,088 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 240 | 280+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | 650+44% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 235e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-350M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 235e versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-350M — the Athlon II X2 235e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 235e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 235e) vs 16 (Core i3-350M) — the Core i3-350M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 235e) and HM55,HM57 (Core i3-350M).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 235e | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+25% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 235e) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-350M). The Core i3-350M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon II X2 235e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop, Core i3-350M targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300; Core i3-350M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 235e | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop | Entry Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 235e was priced at $69, while the Core i3-350M came in at $130. On launch pricing ($69 vs $130), Athlon II X2 235e was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 235e delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-350M — making the Athlon II X2 235e the 60.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 235e | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-47% | $130 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6+86% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















