
Athlon II N370

Athlon II X2 235e
Athlon II N370 vs Athlon II X2 235e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II N370 vs Athlon II X2 235e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II N370 vs Athlon II X2 235e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II N370
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (220 vs 240).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (420 vs 450).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 235e.
Athlon II X2 235e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+9.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Athlon II N370.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 235e better than Athlon II N370?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II N370 vs Athlon II X2 235e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N370
The Athlon II N370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon II X2 235e
The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II N370 and Athlon II X2 235e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II N370 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e. The Athlon II N370 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X2 235e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N370 scores 1,085 against the Athlon II X2 235e's 1,079 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II N370. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 240, a 8.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 235e that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 420 vs 450 (6.9% advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e).
| Feature | Athlon II N370 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Champlain (2010−2011) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,085 | 1,079 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 220 | 240+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 420 | 450+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II N370 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 235e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II N370 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 235e — the Athlon II X2 235e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 235e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N370) and 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 235e).
| Feature | Athlon II N370 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Athlon II N370 targets Legacy Laptop, Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II N370 rivals Pentium P6100; Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300.
| Feature | Athlon II N370 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II N370 was priced at $60, while the Athlon II X2 235e came in at $69. On launch pricing ($60 vs $69), Athlon II N370 was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N370 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 235e — making the Athlon II N370 the 14.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II N370 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-13% | $69 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.1+16% | 15.6 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















