Athlon II N370 vs Pentium B970

Athlon II N370 vs Pentium B970 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II N370

2 / 2

1,085

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium B970

2 / 2

1,093

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II N370 vs Pentium B970 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II N370 vs Pentium B970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II N370

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Delivers 106.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 8.7 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,085 vs 1,093).

Pentium B970

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.7 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($125 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II N370 better than Pentium B970?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II N370 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium B970 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium B970 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II N370 is the better buy right now. Athlon II N370 comes in $65 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $125 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium B970 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 106.8% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 8.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium B970 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II N370 vs Pentium B970 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N370

The Athlon II N370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium B970

The Pentium B970 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $125.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II N370 and Pentium B970 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II N370 versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium B970 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II N370. The Athlon II N370 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium B970 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N370 scores 1,085 against the Pentium B970's 1,093 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium B970.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Pentium B970
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,085	1,093
Geekbench 6 Single	220	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	420	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II N370 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium B970 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Pentium B970
Socket	S1	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II N370) / not specified (Pentium B970). Primary use case: Athlon II N370 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II N370 rivals Pentium P6100.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Pentium B970
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Legacy Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II N370 was priced at $60, while the Pentium B970 came in at $125. On launch pricing ($60 vs $125), Athlon II N370 was $65 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N370 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 8.7 pts/$ for the Pentium B970 — making the Athlon II N370 the 69.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Pentium B970
MSRP	$60-52%	$125
Performance per Dollar	18.1+108%	8.7
Release Date	2010	2012

Search Athlon II N370 on Amazon

Search Pentium B970 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.