Athlon II N370 vs Celeron G1101

AMD

Athlon II N370

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron G1101

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron G1101 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron G1101 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron G1101: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II N370

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 1W instead of 73W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (220 vs 250).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (420 vs 450).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1101 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1101.

Celeron G1101

2010

Why buy it

  • +13.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Athlon II N370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 7200% higher power demand at 73W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1101 better than Athlon II N370?
Yes. Celeron G1101 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7.1% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1101 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1101 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G1101 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1101 comes in $10 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 20.1% better value on MSRP (21.7 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1101 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron G1101 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II N370

The Athlon II N370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II N370 and Celeron G1101 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II N370 versus 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 — a 161% clock advantage for the Athlon II N370. The Athlon II N370 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G1101 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N370 scores 1,085 against the Celeron G1101's 1,086 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1101. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 250, a 12.8% lead for the Celeron G1101 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 420 vs 450 (6.9% advantage for the Celeron G1101).

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G1101
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+826%
0.27 GHz
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,085
1,086
Geekbench 6 Single
220
250+14%
Geekbench 6 Multi
420
450+7%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II N370 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1101 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G1101 supports up to 16.38 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 104.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II N370) vs 16 (Celeron G1101) — the Celeron G1101 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N370) and H55,3420 (Celeron G1101).

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G1101
Socket
S1
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16.38 GB+105%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II N370) vs VT-x (Celeron G1101). The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Athlon II N370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II N370 targets Legacy Laptop, Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II N370 rivals Pentium P6100; Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G1101
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II N370 was priced at $60, while the Celeron G1101 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($60 vs $50), Celeron G1101 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N370 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Celeron G1101 — making the Celeron G1101 the 18.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G1101
MSRP
$60
$50-17%
Performance per Dollar
18.1
21.7+20%
Release Date
2010
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.