Athlon II N370 vs Celeron E3200

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron E3200 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II N370

2 / 2

1,085

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron E3200

2 / 2

1,090

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron E3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron E3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II N370

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (220 vs 340).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (420 vs 610).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Celeron E3200

2009

Why buy it

✅+54.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.3 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($43 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3200 better than Athlon II N370?

Yes. Celeron E3200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 45.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.5% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E3200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E3200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 45.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3200 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3200 comes in $17 cheaper on MSRP at $43 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.2% better value on MSRP (25.3 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II N370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron E3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N370

The Athlon II N370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron E3200

The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II N370 and Celeron E3200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II N370 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Athlon II N370. The Athlon II N370 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron E3200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N370 scores 1,085 against the Celeron E3200's 1,090 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron E3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 340, a 42.9% lead for the Celeron E3200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 420 vs 610 (36.9% advantage for the Celeron E3200).

Feature	Athlon II N370	Celeron E3200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (total)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,085	1,090
Geekbench 6 Single	220	340+55%
Geekbench 6 Multi	420	610+45%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II N370 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II N370 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E3200 — the Athlon II N370 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron E3200 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N370) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3200).

Feature	Athlon II N370	Celeron E3200
Socket	S1	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II N370) vs VT-x (Celeron E3200). Primary use case: Athlon II N370 targets Legacy Laptop, Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II N370 rivals Pentium P6100; Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Celeron E3200
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Legacy Laptop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II N370 was priced at $60, while the Celeron E3200 came in at $43. On launch pricing ($60 vs $43), Celeron E3200 was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N370 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 25.3 pts/$ for the Celeron E3200 — making the Celeron E3200 the 33.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Celeron E3200
MSRP	$60	$43-28%
Performance per Dollar	18.1	25.3+40%
Release Date	2010	2009

Search Athlon II N370 on Amazon

Search Celeron E3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.