Athlon II N370 vs Core i7-620UM

CPU

GPU

Athlon II N370

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-620UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon II N370 vs Core i7-620UM Performance Spectrum

Athlon II N370

2 / 2

1,085

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-620UM

2 / 4

1,091

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II N370 vs Core i7-620UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II N370 vs Core i7-620UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II N370

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
✅Delivers 360.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (220 vs 350).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (420 vs 700).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-620UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-620UM

2010

Why buy it

✅+59.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Athlon II N370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($278 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-620UM better than Athlon II N370?

Yes. Core i7-620UM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 66.7% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-620UM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-620UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 66.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-620UM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-620UM comes in 363.3% more expensive on MSRP at $278 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II N370 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 360.8% better value on paper (18.1 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-620UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II N370 vs Core i7-620UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N370

The Athlon II N370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-620UM

The Core i7-620UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $278.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II N370 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-620UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II N370 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core i7-620UM — a 16% clock advantage for the Athlon II N370. The Athlon II N370 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-620UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N370 scores 1,085 against the Core i7-620UM's 1,091 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-620UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 350, a 45.6% lead for the Core i7-620UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 420 vs 700 (50% advantage for the Core i7-620UM).

Feature	Athlon II N370	Core i7-620UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+17%	2.13 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.06 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,085	1,091
Geekbench 6 Single	220	350+59%
Geekbench 6 Multi	420	700+67%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II N370 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-620UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II N370) vs 16 (Core i7-620UM) — the Core i7-620UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N370) and HM55,QM57 (Core i7-620UM).

Feature	Athlon II N370	Core i7-620UM
Socket	S1	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II N370) vs VT-x (Core i7-620UM). The Core i7-620UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II N370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II N370 targets Legacy Laptop, Core i7-620UM targets Ultra-Portable Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II N370 rivals Pentium P6100; Core i7-620UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Core i7-620UM
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Legacy Laptop	Ultra-Portable Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II N370 was priced at $60, while the Core i7-620UM came in at $278. On launch pricing ($60 vs $278), Athlon II N370 was $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N370 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-620UM — making the Athlon II N370 the 128.7% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II N370	Core i7-620UM
MSRP	$60-78%	$278
Performance per Dollar	18.1+364%	3.9
Release Date	2010	2010

Search Athlon II N370 on Amazon

Search Core i7-620UM on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.