Celeron 2961Y
VS
E2-9010

Celeron 2961Y vs E2-9010

Intel

Celeron 2961Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E2-9010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2961Y is positioned at rank 397 and the E2-9010 is on rank 926, so the Celeron 2961Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2961Y

#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
98%
#385
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
541%
#386
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
533%
#387
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
489%
#388
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
487%
#389
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
483%
#391
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
466%
#392
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
447%
#393
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
446%
#394
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
434%
#397
Celeron 2961Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9010

#914
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1641%
#915
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1617%
#916
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1484%
#917
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1478%
#918
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1464%
#920
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1414%
#921
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1356%
#922
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1353%
#923
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1317%
#926
E2-9010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E2-9010 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 2961Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 2961YE2-9010
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2961YE2-9010
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2961Y and E2-9010

Intel

Celeron 2961Y

The Celeron 2961Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

E2-9010

The E2-9010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,073 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2961Y and E2-9010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 2961Y versus 2.2 GHz on the E2-9010 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the E2-9010 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron 2961Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-9010 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2961Y scores 1,085 against the E2-9010's 1,073 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron 2961Y.

FeatureCeleron 2961YE2-9010
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.1 GHz
2.2 GHz+100%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2 GHz+82%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,085+1%
1,073
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2961Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-9010 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 2961YE2-9010
Socket
FCBGA1168
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2961Y) / not specified (E2-9010). The Celeron 2961Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the E2-9010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2961Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2961Y rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCeleron 2961YE2-9010
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget