Celeron 3765U vs A4-1200

CPU

GPU

Celeron 3765U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015

A4-1200

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 3765U

2 / 2

1,252

+0.3%

1,248

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3765U is positioned at rank 445 and the A4-1200 is on rank 859, so the Celeron 3765U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3765U

#433

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

586%

#434

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

577%

#435

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

530%

#436

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

528%

#437

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

523%

#439

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

505%

#440

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

484%

#441

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

483%

#442

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

470%

#445

Celeron 3765U

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-1200

#847

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1411%

#848

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1390%

#849

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1276%

#850

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1270%

#851

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1259%

#853

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1215%

#854

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1165%

#855

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1163%

#856

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1132%

#859

A4-1200

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#863

Pentium Dual Core T2390

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

99%

#867

Core i7-1160G7

MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A

98%

#873

Celeron M 540

MSRP: $86|Avg: $20

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 3765U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A4-1200 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron 3765U	A4-1200
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Celeron 3765U	A4-1200
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 3765U Benchmark Check

A4-1200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3765U and A4-1200

Celeron 3765U

The Celeron 3765U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,252 points. Launch price was $107.

A4-1200

The A4-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3765U and A4-1200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 3765U versus 1 GHz on the A4-1200 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 3765U. The Celeron 3765U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A4-1200 uses Temash (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3765U scores 1,252 against the A4-1200's 1,248 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 3765U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3765U vs 0 kB on the A4-1200.

Feature	Celeron 3765U	A4-1200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+90%	1 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Temash (2013)
PassMark	1,252	1,248
Geekbench 6 Single	—	70

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3765U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A4-1200 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 3765U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 3765U) vs 1 (A4-1200). PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3765U) vs 8 (A4-1200) — the Celeron 3765U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 3765U	A4-1200
Socket	FCBGA1168	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	12+50%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3765U) vs AMD-V (A4-1200). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Broadwell) (Celeron 3765U) and Radeon HD 8180 (A4-1200) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3765U targets Budget, A4-1200 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: Celeron 3765U rivals Pentium 3825U; A4-1200 rivals Atom Z2760.