Celeron 3765U vs Core i3-330E

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3765U vs Core i3-330E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3765U vs Core i3-330E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3765U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Core i3-330E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,252 vs 1,260).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Core i3-330E

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $177 MSRP, while Celeron 3765U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3765U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-330E better than Celeron 3765U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 3765U is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330E pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i3-330E also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-330E is the better buy right now. Core i3-330E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $177 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron 3765U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3765U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3765U vs Core i3-330E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3765U

The Celeron 3765U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,252 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-330E

The Core i3-330E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,260 points. Launch price was $177.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3765U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 3765U versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-330E — a 193.8% clock advantage for the Celeron 3765U (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron 3765U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-330E uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3765U scores 1,252 against the Core i3-330E's 1,260 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-330E. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3765U vs 3 MB on the Core i3-330E.

Feature	Celeron 3765U	Core i3-330E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+6233%	0.03 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.13 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,252	1,260

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3765U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-330E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3765U	Core i3-330E
Socket	FCBGA1168	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3765U) / not specified (Core i3-330E). The Celeron 3765U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Core i3-330E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3765U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3765U rivals Pentium 3825U.