Celeron 3765U vs Pentium N3700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3765U vs Pentium N3700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3765U vs Pentium N3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3765U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Pentium N3700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Pentium N3700

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,248 vs 1,252).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3765U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3700 better than Celeron 3765U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium N3700 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3765U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3765U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3700 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium N3700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3700 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron 3765U vs Pentium N3700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3765U

The Celeron 3765U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,252 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium N3700

The Pentium N3700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3765U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 3765U versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium N3700 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Pentium N3700 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 3765U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium N3700 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3765U scores 1,252 against the Pentium N3700's 1,248 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 3765U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3765U vs 0 kB on the Pentium N3700.

Feature	Celeron 3765U	Pentium N3700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+19%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,252	1,248

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3765U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium N3700 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3765U	Pentium N3700
Socket	FCBGA1168	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3765U) / not specified (Pentium N3700). The Celeron 3765U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Pentium N3700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3765U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3765U rivals Pentium 3825U.