Celeron 3965U
VS
Pentium G2030

Celeron 3965U vs Pentium G2030

Intel

Celeron 3965U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Pentium G2030

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WW2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3965U is positioned at rank 265 and the Pentium G2030 is on rank 778, so the Celeron 3965U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3965U

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
99%
#253
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
418%
#254
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
412%
#255
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
378%
#256
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
377%
#257
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
373%
#259
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
361%
#260
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
346%
#261
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
345%
#262
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
336%
#265
Celeron 3965U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G2030

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14979%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14154%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10277%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3096%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2452%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2145%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1229%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1213%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1092%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1062%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1047%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1043%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1034%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
#777
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
100%
#778
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
100%
#779
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
100%
#780
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#782
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
99%
#783
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#784
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#785
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#786
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
98%
#787
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
98%
#788
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#790
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#791
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#792
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3965U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 3965UPentium G2030
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium G2030 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 3965UPentium G2030
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3965U and Pentium G2030

Intel

Celeron 3965U

The Celeron 3965U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium G2030

The Pentium G2030 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,769 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3965U and Pentium G2030 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron 3965U is built on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 3965U scores 1,753 against the Pentium G2030's 1,769 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium G2030. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 600 vs 492, a 19.8% lead for the Celeron 3965U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,200 vs 826 (36.9% advantage for the Celeron 3965U). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3965U vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G2030.

FeatureCeleron 3965UPentium G2030
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-U (2017)
PassMark
1,753
1,769
Cinebench R23 Multi
608
Geekbench 6 Single
600+22%
492
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,200+45%
826
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3965U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2030 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 3965U versus DDR3-1600 on the Pentium G2030 — the Celeron 3965U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 3965U) vs 16 (Pentium G2030) — the Pentium G2030 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron 3965U) and H61,B75,H77,Z77,Q77 (Pentium G2030).

FeatureCeleron 3965UPentium G2030
Socket
BGA1356
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
16+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3965U) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) (Pentium G2030) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3965U targets Budget Laptop, Pentium G2030 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3965U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U; Pentium G2030 rivals Core i3-2100.

FeatureCeleron 3965UPentium G2030
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Budget