A10-4657M vs Celeron 3965U
A10-4657M
Celeron 3965U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-4657M is positioned at rank 713 and the Celeron 3965U is on rank 265, so the Celeron 3965U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-4657M
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3965U
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-4657M | Celeron 3965U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-4657M | Celeron 3965U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-4657M and Celeron 3965U
A10-4657M
The A10-4657M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,759 points. Launch price was $130.
Celeron 3965U
The Celeron 3965U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The A10-4657M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 3965U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4657M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4657M versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 3965U — a 37% clock advantage for the A10-4657M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A10-4657M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 3965U uses Kaby Lake-U (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4657M scores 1,759 against the Celeron 3965U's 1,753 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-4657M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 600, a 28.6% lead for the Celeron 3965U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,200 vs 1,200 (0% advantage for the Celeron 3965U).
| Feature | A10-4657M | Celeron 3965U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+45% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+5% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Kaby Lake-U (2017) |
| PassMark | 1,759 | 1,753 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | 600+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,200 | 1,200 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-4657M uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 3965U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4657M versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 3965U — the Celeron 3965U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4657M) vs 10 (Celeron 3965U) — the A10-4657M offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10-4657M | Celeron 3965U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4657M) vs VT-x (Celeron 3965U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660G (A10-4657M) and Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3965U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4657M targets Laptop, Celeron 3965U targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4657M rivals Core i3-2330M; Celeron 3965U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.
| Feature | A10-4657M | Celeron 3965U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7660G | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Laptop | Budget Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-4657M and Celeron 3965U
