A10-4657M vs Athlon II P320
A10-4657M
Athlon II P320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-4657M is positioned at rank 713 and the Athlon II P320 is on rank 622, so the Athlon II P320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-4657M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II P320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-4657M | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-4657M | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-4657M and Athlon II P320
A10-4657M
The A10-4657M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,759 points. Launch price was $130.
Athlon II P320
The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The A10-4657M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II P320 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4657M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4657M versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 — a 41.5% clock advantage for the A10-4657M. The A10-4657M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II P320 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4657M scores 1,759 against the Athlon II P320's 1,776 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II P320. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 189, a 81.7% lead for the A10-4657M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,200 vs 308 (118.3% advantage for the A10-4657M).
| Feature | A10-4657M | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | — |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,759 | 1,776 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450+138% | 189 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,200+290% | 308 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-4657M uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II P320 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A10-4657M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4657M) vs 0 (Athlon II P320) — the A10-4657M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10-4657M | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA | S1g4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10-4657M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon II P320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4657M targets Laptop, Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4657M rivals Core i3-2330M; Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | A10-4657M | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7660G | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Laptop | Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-4657M and Athlon II P320
