A10-4657M vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+

A10-4657M vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+ Performance Spectrum

A10-4657M

4 / 4

1,759

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2 / 2

1,745

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4657M vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4657M vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4657M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 89W, a 85W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Athlon 64 X2 5800+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,745 vs 1,759).
❌Launch MSRP is still $230 MSRP, while A10-4657M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2125% higher power demand at 89W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4657M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4657M better than Athlon 64 X2 5800+?

Yes. A10-4657M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4657M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4657M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4657M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-4657M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $230 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 X2 5800+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4657M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4657M vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4657M

The A10-4657M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,759 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4657M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4657M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4657M versus 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — a 6.5% clock advantage for the A10-4657M. The A10-4657M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4657M scores 1,759 against the Athlon 64 X2 5800+'s 1,745 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-4657M.

Feature	A10-4657M	Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Brisbane (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,759	1,745
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4657M uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4657M versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — the A10-4657M supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-4657M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4657M) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) — the A10-4657M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-4657M	Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Socket	BGA	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-4657M) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+). The A10-4657M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4657M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4657M rivals Core i3-2330M.