A10-4657M vs Xeon E5405

A10-4657M vs Xeon E5405 Performance Spectrum

A10-4657M

4 / 4

1,759

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5405

4 / 4

1,753

0.0%

Celeron P4600

Celeron Dual-Core T3100

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4657M vs Xeon E5405 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4657M vs Xeon E5405: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4657M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Xeon E5405 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5405

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,753 vs 1,759).
❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while A10-4657M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1900% higher power demand at 80W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4657M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4657M better than Xeon E5405?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5405 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-4657M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4657M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 17 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4657M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4657M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5405 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A10-4657M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $209 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5405 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4657M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4657M vs Xeon E5405 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4657M

The A10-4657M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,759 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon E5405

The Xeon E5405 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-4657M and Xeon E5405 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4657M versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5405 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A10-4657M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-4657M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5405 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4657M scores 1,759 against the Xeon E5405's 1,753 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-4657M.

Feature	A10-4657M	Xeon E5405
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,759	1,753
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4657M uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5405 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4657M versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5405 — the A10-4657M supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4657M) vs 0 (Xeon E5405) — the A10-4657M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-4657M	Xeon E5405
Socket	BGA	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+140%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4657M) vs VT-x (Xeon E5405). The A10-4657M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Xeon E5405 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4657M targets Laptop, Xeon E5405 targets Server. Direct competitor: A10-4657M rivals Core i3-2330M.