A10-4657M vs Core Duo T2600

A10-4657M vs Core Duo T2600 Performance Spectrum

A10-4657M

4 / 4

1,759

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2600

2 / 2

1,765

+0.3%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4657M vs Core Duo T2600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4657M vs Core Duo T2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4657M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Core Duo T2600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,759 vs 1,765).
❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2600

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4657M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Duo T2600 better than A10-4657M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-4657M is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2600 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Duo T2600 still makes the most sense overall. Core Duo T2600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4657M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-4657M vs Core Duo T2600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4657M

The A10-4657M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,759 points. Launch price was $130.

Core Duo T2600

The Core Duo T2600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 January 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,765 points. Launch price was $440.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4657M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4657M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4657M versus 2.16 GHz on the Core Duo T2600 — a 38.8% clock advantage for the A10-4657M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). The A10-4657M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core Duo T2600 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4657M scores 1,759 against the Core Duo T2600's 1,765 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Duo T2600.

Feature	A10-4657M	Core Duo T2600
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+48%	2.16 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+6%	2.16 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,759	1,765
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4657M uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-4657M	Core Duo T2600
Socket	BGA	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-4657M) / not specified (Core Duo T2600). The A10-4657M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Core Duo T2600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4657M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4657M rivals Core i3-2330M.