Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen 5 5600
Celeron 3965U
Ryzen 5 5600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 3965U is positioned at rank #265 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3965U
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 5600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 3965U | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($115) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (2020−2025) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 3965U | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($115) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3965U and Ryzen 5 5600
Celeron 3965U
The Celeron 3965U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $107.
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Celeron 3965U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 3965U versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron 3965U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3965U scores 1,753 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 169.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 600 vs 2,052, a 109.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,200 vs 8,600 (151% advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3965U vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Celeron 3965U | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+100% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+59% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-U (2017) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 1,753 | 21,550+1129% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 600 | 2,052+242% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,200 | 8,600+617% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 3965U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 3965U) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron 3965U) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | Celeron 3965U | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 24+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 3965U) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). The Celeron 3965U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3965U targets Budget Laptop, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 3965U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.
| Feature | Celeron 3965U | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 3965U and Ryzen 5 5600
