Celeron 887
VS
V-Series V120

Celeron 887 vs V-Series V120

Intel

Celeron 887

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
VS
AMD

V-Series V120

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 887 is positioned at rank 837 and the V-Series V120 is on rank 594, so the V-Series V120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 887

#825
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1344%
#826
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1324%
#827
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1216%
#828
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1210%
#829
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1199%
#831
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1158%
#832
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1110%
#833
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1109%
#834
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1079%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar V-Series V120

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
99%
#582
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
783%
#583
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
771%
#584
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
708%
#585
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
705%
#586
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
698%
#588
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
674%
#589
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
647%
#590
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
646%
#591
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
628%
#594
V-Series V120
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The V-Series V120 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 887 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 887V-Series V120
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 887V-Series V120
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 887 and V-Series V120

Intel

Celeron 887

The Celeron 887 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

V-Series V120

The V-Series V120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,874 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron 887 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the V-Series V120 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 887 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 887 versus 2.2 GHz on the V-Series V120 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the V-Series V120. The Celeron 887 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the V-Series V120 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 887 scores 1,877 against the V-Series V120's 1,874 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 887.

FeatureCeleron 887V-Series V120
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.2 GHz+47%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,877
1,874
Geekbench 6 Single
233
Geekbench 6 Multi
415
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 887 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the V-Series V120 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 887V-Series V120
Socket
BGA1023
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 887) / not specified (V-Series V120). The Celeron 887 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the V-Series V120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 887 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron 887 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron 887V-Series V120
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop