Celeron 887
VS
Celeron M P4600

Celeron 887 vs Celeron M P4600

Intel

Celeron 887

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron M P4600

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 887 is positioned at rank 837 and the Celeron M P4600 is on rank 836, so the Celeron M P4600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 887

#825
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1344%
#826
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1324%
#827
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1216%
#828
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1210%
#829
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1199%
#831
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1158%
#832
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1110%
#833
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1109%
#834
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1079%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M P4600

#824
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1338%
#825
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1318%
#826
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1210%
#827
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1205%
#828
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1194%
#830
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1153%
#831
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1105%
#832
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1104%
#833
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1074%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron M P4600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 887 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 887Celeron M P4600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron M P4600 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($15 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron 887Celeron M P4600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 887 and Celeron M P4600

Intel

Celeron 887

The Celeron 887 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 887 and Celeron M P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 887 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron M P4600. The Celeron 887 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M P4600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 887 scores 1,877 against the Celeron M P4600's 1,886 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M P4600. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 887 vs 2 MB on the Celeron M P4600.

FeatureCeleron 887Celeron M P4600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,877
1,886
Geekbench 6 Single
233
Geekbench 6 Multi
415
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 887 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 887Celeron M P4600
Socket
BGA1023
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 887) / not specified (Celeron M P4600). The Celeron 887 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron M P4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 887 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron 887 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron 887Celeron M P4600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 887 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Celeron M P4600 debuted at $86. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Celeron M P4600 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 887 delivers 125.1 pts/$ vs 125.7 pts/$ for the Celeron M P4600 — making the Celeron M P4600 the 0.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 887Celeron M P4600
MSRP
$86
$86
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
125.1
125.7
Release Date
2012
2010