
A6-9500

Celeron 887
A6-9500 vs Celeron 887 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-9500 vs Celeron 887 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-9500 vs Celeron 887: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-9500
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,876 vs 1,877).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($101 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
Celeron 887
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 887 better than A6-9500?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-9500 vs Celeron 887 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9500
The A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $64.

Celeron 887
The Celeron 887 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
Both the A6-9500 and Celeron 887 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-9500 versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 887 — a 86.8% clock advantage for the A6-9500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A6-9500 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 887 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500 scores 1,876 against the Celeron 887's 1,877 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 887. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 887.
| Feature | A6-9500 | Celeron 887 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+153% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+133% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,876 | 1,877 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 233 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 415 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 887 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 887 — the A6-9500 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500) vs 16 (Celeron 887) — the Celeron 887 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9500) and HM65,HM67,QM67,HM70,HM76 (Celeron 887).
| Feature | A6-9500 | Celeron 887 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+80% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500) / VT-x (Celeron 887). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9500) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 887) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 887 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron 887 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | A6-9500 | Celeron 887 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R5 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A6-9500 was priced at $101, while the Celeron 887 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($101 vs $86), Celeron 887 was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-9500 delivers 18.6 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 887 — making the Celeron 887 the 16.1% better value option.
| Feature | A6-9500 | Celeron 887 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $101 | $86-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.6 | 21.8+17% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















