A6-9500 vs Celeron 887

AMD

A6-9500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron 887

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

A6-9500 vs Celeron 887 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9500 vs Celeron 887 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9500 vs Celeron 887: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9500

2017

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,876 vs 1,877).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($101 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
    • 282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

    Celeron 887

    2012

    Why buy it

    • +0.1% higher PassMark.
    • Costs $15 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
    • Delivers 17.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
    • Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
    • 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron 887 better than A6-9500?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9500 is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 887 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 887 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron 887 is the better buy right now. Celeron 887 comes in $15 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $101 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-9500 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 17.5% better value on MSRP (21.8 vs 18.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    A6-9500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A6-9500 vs Celeron 887 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A6-9500

    The A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $64.

    Intel

    Celeron 887

    The Celeron 887 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $86.

    Processing Power

    Both the A6-9500 and Celeron 887 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-9500 versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 887 — a 86.8% clock advantage for the A6-9500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A6-9500 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 887 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500 scores 1,876 against the Celeron 887's 1,877 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 887. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 887.

    FeatureA6-9500Celeron 887
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    3.8 GHz+153%
    1.5 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.5 GHz+133%
    1.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1024 kB+300%
    256K (per core)
    Process
    28 nm-13%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    PassMark
    1,876
    1,877
    Geekbench 6 Single
    233
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    415
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 887 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 887 — the A6-9500 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500) vs 16 (Celeron 887) — the Celeron 887 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9500) and HM65,HM67,QM67,HM70,HM76 (Celeron 887).

    FeatureA6-9500Celeron 887
    Socket
    AM4
    BGA1023
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2400+80%
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB+300%
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    8
    16+100%
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500) / VT-x (Celeron 887). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9500) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 887) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 887 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron 887 rivals Pentium 967.

    FeatureA6-9500Celeron 887
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    AMD Radeon R5
    Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Laptop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the A6-9500 was priced at $101, while the Celeron 887 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($101 vs $86), Celeron 887 was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-9500 delivers 18.6 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 887 — making the Celeron 887 the 16.1% better value option.

    FeatureA6-9500Celeron 887
    MSRP
    $101
    $86-15%
    Performance per Dollar
    18.6
    21.8+17%
    Release Date
    2017
    2012

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.