A6-9500
VS
Core i7-2637M

A6-9500 vs Core i7-2637M

AMD

A6-9500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-2637M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9500 is positioned at rank 823 and the Core i7-2637M is on rank 1176, so the A6-9500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16786%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15861%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11516%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3469%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2748%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2404%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1377%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1359%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1237%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1237%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1223%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1190%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1174%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1169%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1158%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
99%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
99%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2637M

#1164
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4486%
#1165
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4420%
#1166
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4058%
#1167
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4040%
#1168
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4003%
#1170
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3865%
#1171
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3706%
#1172
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3700%
#1173
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3601%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
100%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
99%
#1178
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
99%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
99%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
99%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
96%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
93%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
93%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
92%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
92%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9500 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9500Core i7-2637M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2637M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9500Core i7-2637M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1048%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9500 and Core i7-2637M

AMD

A6-9500

The A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $64.

Intel

Core i7-2637M

The Core i7-2637M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,889 points. Launch price was $289.

Processing Power

The A6-9500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-2637M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-9500 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-2637M — a 30.3% clock advantage for the A6-9500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The A6-9500 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2637M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500 scores 1,876 against the Core i7-2637M's 1,889 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-2637M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2637M.

FeatureA6-9500Core i7-2637M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+36%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+106%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,876
1,889
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
628
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2637M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500 versus 1333 on the Core i7-2637M — the Core i7-2637M supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500) vs 16 (Core i7-2637M) — the Core i7-2637M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9500) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i7-2637M).

FeatureA6-9500Core i7-2637M
Socket
AM4
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
1333+33225%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+838860700%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500) / true (Core i7-2637M). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9500) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2637M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

FeatureA6-9500Core i7-2637M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The A6-9500 launched at $101 MSRP, while the Core i7-2637M debuted at $289.

FeatureA6-9500Core i7-2637M
MSRP
$101-65%
$289
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Release Date
2017
2011