A6-9500 vs Celeron M P4600

A6-9500 vs Celeron M P4600 Performance Spectrum

A6-9500

2 / 2

1,876

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M P4600

2 / 2

1,886

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9500 vs Celeron M P4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9500 vs Celeron M P4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9500

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Celeron M P4600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,876 vs 1,886).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($101 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Celeron M P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-9500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9500 better than Celeron M P4600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9500 is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4600 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9500 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-9500 comes in 17.4% more expensive on MSRP at $101 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M P4600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 18.1% better value on paper (21.9 vs 18.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9500 vs Celeron M P4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9500

The A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $64.

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9500 and Celeron M P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-9500 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the A6-9500. The A6-9500 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron M P4600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500 scores 1,876 against the Celeron M P4600's 1,886 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M P4600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500 vs 2 MB on the Celeron M P4600.

Feature	A6-9500	Celeron M P4600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+90%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,876	1,886

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-9500	Celeron M P4600
Socket	AM4	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

The A6-9500 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Celeron M P4600 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	A6-9500	Celeron M P4600
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R5	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-9500 was priced at $101, while the Celeron M P4600 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($101 vs $86), Celeron M P4600 was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-9500 delivers 18.6 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the Celeron M P4600 — making the Celeron M P4600 the 16.6% better value option.

Feature	A6-9500	Celeron M P4600
MSRP	$101	$86-15%
Performance per Dollar	18.6	21.9+18%
Release Date	2017	2010

Search A6-9500 on Amazon

Search Celeron M P4600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.