PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B730 vs Celeron N3010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B730 vs Celeron N3010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B730

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $37 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 48.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 6.9 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (715 vs 735).
❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

Celeron N3010

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3010 better than Celeron B730?

Yes. Celeron N3010 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3010 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3010 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3010 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N3010 comes in 52.9% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B730 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 48.7% better value on paper (10.2 vs 6.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on G2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B730 vs Celeron N3010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B730

The Celeron B730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 256 kB + 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron N3010

The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B730 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N3010 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N3010 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron B730 versus 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3010 — a 21.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N3010. The Celeron B730 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3010 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B730 scores 715 against the Celeron N3010's 735 — a 2.8% lead for the Celeron N3010. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B730 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N3010.

Feature	Celeron B730	Celeron N3010
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.24 GHz+24%
Base Clock	—	1.04 GHz
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	715	735+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B730 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3010 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B730 versus 1600 on the Celeron N3010 — the Celeron N3010 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B730 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B730) vs 4 (Celeron N3010) — the Celeron B730 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B730) and Braswell (Celeron N3010).

Feature	Celeron B730	Celeron N3010
Socket	G2	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B730) vs true (Celeron N3010). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B730) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3010) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B730 targets Budget, Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron B730 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B730	Celeron N3010
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	Budget Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B730 was priced at $70, while the Celeron N3010 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($70 vs $107), Celeron B730 was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B730 delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 6.9 pts/$ for the Celeron N3010 — making the Celeron B730 the 39.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B730	Celeron N3010
MSRP	$70-35%	$107
Performance per Dollar	10.2+48%	6.9
Release Date	2012	2016

Search Celeron B730 on Amazon

Search Celeron N3010 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.