Celeron B730 vs Pentium T2370

Intel

Celeron B730

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium T2370

35 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron B730 vs Pentium T2370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B730 vs Pentium T2370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B730 vs Pentium T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B730

2012

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB).
  • Costs $16 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
  • Delivers 17.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 8.7 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium T2370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T2370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (715 vs 745).

Pentium T2370

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 1.5 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.7 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron B730 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium T2370 better than Celeron B730?
Yes. Pentium T2370 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium T2370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T2370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium T2370 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium T2370 comes in 22.9% more expensive on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B730 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 17.9% better value on paper (10.2 vs 8.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on G2.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron B730 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and 50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B730 vs Pentium T2370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron B730

The Celeron B730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 256 kB + 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Pentium T2370

The Pentium T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 745 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron B730 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron B730 scores 715 against the Pentium T2370's 745 — a 4.1% lead for the Pentium T2370. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B730 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2370.

FeatureCeleron B730Pentium T2370
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.73 GHz
L3 Cache
1.5 MB (total)+50%
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
715
745+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B730 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron B730Pentium T2370
Socket
G2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B730) / not specified (Pentium T2370). The Celeron B730 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium T2370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B730 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B730 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B730Pentium T2370
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B730 was priced at $70, while the Pentium T2370 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($70 vs $86), Celeron B730 was $16 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B730 delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 8.7 pts/$ for the Pentium T2370 — making the Celeron B730 the 16.4% better value option.

FeatureCeleron B730Pentium T2370
MSRP
$70-19%
$86
Performance per Dollar
10.2+17%
8.7
Release Date
2012
2008

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.